balochistan education

The Education System of Balochistan – Public Spending and Learning Outcomes 

Batoora Achakzai discusses the critical relationship between public education spending and learning outcomes in Balochistan, Pakistan, focusing on the major challenges of inadequate funding and resources. She emphasizes that while financial investment is necessary to improve infrastructure and train teachers, it is insufficient without focused management and systemic reforms. Sharing personal insights from her experiences, she underscores the urgent need to address educational disparities, particularly for marginalized groups, to foster regional socio-economic development.

Community forum banner

The connection between public education spending and learning outcomes is of significant concern, especially in areas where learning institutions receive little funding and are, therefore, ineffective. Government expenditure on education can effectively expand and enhance the learners’ chances to enhance their competencies for quantifiable returns on socio-economic development. Unfortunately, education is a central component in the politico-economic development wheel, providing human capital that will fuel the economy, social transformation and political stability. However, it is important to note that the impact of investing in such areas depends not on the amount of money spent but on how focused and balanced the funds are directed, administered, and used to rectify certain dysfunctions, gaps or areas of concern in the system. Education in Balochistan, or the lack thereof, is a crucial challenge that needs to be addressed urgently.

Not surprisingly, this becomes an even more urgent issue in areas with sizable gaps in systemic educational disparities. Rural and marginalised areas in many developing countries too often get disproportionately less funding and perpetuate cycles of poverty and inequality. For example, inadequate infrastructure, untrained teachers and poorly outdated curricula in underfunded schools leave millions of children suppressed in poor learning conditions that don’t meet basic educational standards. Such inequities warrant answers to basic questions about how public spending is allocated and the need for policies that ensure resources get to the most marginalised communities. The stakes are particularly high when socio-economic development is obstructed by educational deprivation, such as in Balochistan.

The nature and strength of the debate on whether extra financial resources alone can improve educational outcomes or whether structural reforms are required to make a difference continues to be perhaps the most important in understanding the dynamics of education systems worldwide. Financial investment plays a major role in building infrastructure, training teachers, and supplying necessary learning materials, but having just the funds isn’t enough to ensure success. The real work is in putting in place accountability mechanisms, aligning expenditures to developmental goals, and unravelling the systemic inefficiencies that compound progress, which is the job of the Government of Balochistan. The fact that the issue is so complex and calls for a dual focus on financial inputs and systemic reforms reflects the fact that it is only through a multifaceted approach appropriate to the peculiarities of each region that changes of meaning can really be made.

For me, this topic is a little more than a concern because I happen to come from Balochistan, a province in Pakistan that is considered the most backward and deprived in terms of resources and opportunities. Education is a major issue in Balochistan as most schools are compelled to commence their academic session without adequate electricity, clean water supply, or proper classrooms. These infrastructural deficits, alongside a devastating dearth of trained educators, produce a context in which learning just becomes almost unfeasible. Most schools in rural parts of the province have inexperienced or poorly qualified teachers who cannot attend professional development workshops or use up-to-date technologies in teaching. This situation aggravates the problem because not only do students have no access to study materials, but they are also deprived of the ability to learn from competent teachers.

The implications of these deficiencies are quite enormous, entrenching poverty and socio-economic stagnation cycles that have continued to retard the growth of the province in most development parameters that are prevailing in the rest of the country. However, for most vulnerable groups of people, such as the girl child and children in remote areas, the challenges are even bigger. These categories of people do not go to school as cultural practices and poor facilities or safer learning environments are lacking, mainly resulting in a high gender gap in literacy and learning. I observed the problems described above directly, which made me realise how important it is to solve them not only for individuals’ sake but for the province and the whole country with its socio-economic development as well.

Such personal experiences made me think about the responsibilities of public expenditure on education in influencing students’ learning in such circumstances. Despite the dire need for additional funding to deal with the province’s inherited and compounded resource deficits, my ponderations make me wonder if money alone is enough to solve such structural problems. The absence of recognisable authority, ineffectiveness in managing and distributing funds equitably, and failure in delivering particular services to those most in need all signify that other methods are required. This was done to critically analyse the dynamics involved in determining these needs, trying to understand how public education spending could be better utilised to institute positive change to the learning process. My focus will be to relate financial investment and their resultant effects presupposing the socio-economic and cultural context of the world, such as Balochistan, to solve their problems and where education can create an equitable and sustainable future.

The consequences of uneven education funding in society and at the system level are highly compelling, more so in areas like Balochistan, where inequity in the distribution of resources has been pervasive. They stated that funding mechanisms that were not proportional, such as property tax-based ones, directly discriminated against states with low property value and low economic activity. From my point of view, it resembles inequality, wherein rich zones can enrich their schools, hire competent faculty, and offer ample learning facilities. In contrast, disadvantaged zones remain stranded in underdevelopment with poor resources. Such a skewed system not only hinders students with chances in facilities-starved areas but also continues to create feelings of abandonment and rejection, resulting in the alienation of thoroughly disliked parts of the community.

In my opinion, it is disappointing, to say the least, to note that this inequality transcends the education domain to shape all spheres of social advancement. In this context of Balochistan, it can be said that the gross neglect of educational investments bears the brunt of the province’s economic and social development. There are limited professional employment and decent livelihoods in the labour market, thus confining and pauperising those with low education attainment levels and suppressing economic growth. Also, weak education systems do not prepare people for active participation in their societies or governance and critical thinking; thus, societies lack a voice to properly demand their rights or result in other cases. This results in more elimination of basic structures, which leads to more discrimination, leading to regions like Balochistan being left far behind the rest of the country. The absence of quality education also erodes social stability since equity in learning is the foundation. Where disparities arise, there is a tendency for one region or district to view the other as having an unfair advantage.

In response to these issues, I think there is a pressing need to reimagine how learning success is determined and how funds are distributed. In this case, success should not be measured by mere national standards, pass rates or enrollments but by whether all zones have been given equal chances to prosper. This means a complete reversal of such policies that would require solution-based funding policies whereby resources are allocated according to needs regardless of the richness of the locality or political pressure. Further, it demands the establishment of a higher level of reforms and proper regulation to make appropriate use of all the funds so that it helps students directly. When used together, these could help avoid situations where resources provided by the public age do not translate to positive impacts for learners through audits, embracing community involvement and feedback. The above changes would not only narrow the achievement gap but also encourage positive citizenship in as much as common education creates a basis for a progressive society regarding equitable development.


If you want to submit your articles, research papers, and book reviews, please check the Submissions page.

The views and opinions expressed in this article/paper are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Paradigm Shift.

Batoora Achakzai

Batoora Achakzai is a student of MS Governance and Public Policy at NUST, Islamabad.

Click to access the login or register cheese