Pakistan’s Government is on the verge of flipping the script on its bureaucracy. The Central Superior Services (CSS), the system that’s been picking the country’s top administrators since 1947, might soon get a total makeover. A team led by Planning Minister Ahsan Iqbal just wrapped up a bold plan to toss out the old-fashioned exam process and roll out new reforms in CSS under something called a cluster-based system instead. If the federal cabinet approves, this could shake up how Pakistan hires and places its civil servants, putting people with specific know-how ahead of the generalists that have usually reigned supreme.
The CSS exam has been around since Pakistan was born, built off the British colonial model. Every year, thousands of eager young people, cramming essays and random facts into their heads, battle it out in a tough exam run by the Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC). If they pass, they get slotted into groups like the Pakistan Administrative Service or the Inland Revenue Service, whether or not their degrees match the job. It’s always been about producing flexible generalists who can bounce around wherever they’re needed.
But people are fed up with that setup, particularly now when Pakistan has been stuck with a sluggish economy, a growing debt mess, and a government that struggles to get stuff done. These reforms have become more of a lifeline than anything else, and they are a way for the nation to improve the quality of their bureaucrats.
In the cluster-based system, there won’t be one giant exam for everybody; each job group will get its own custom test. Want to work in taxes? You’d take an exam on budgets and economics. Dreaming of diplomacy? You’d face questions about global politics. Additionally, only certain degree holders would be allowed to pursue field-specific roles, like Law/Criminology students for the Police or International Relations students for the Foreign Service.
The cluster plan sounds appealing. Matching people to jobs based on what they’re good at could finally bring some real talent into the mix. Picture health experts running the health ministry or tech nerds fixing our IT systems, not just random officers with English Literature degrees. It could make policies and services sharper.
The idea has been successfully implemented in countries like Singapore and South Korea. Nations such as them have thrived by integrating specialists into their bureaucracies. Singapore’s Public Service Commission, for instance, recruits talent into targeted streams, such as engineering, economics, and diplomacy, ensuring that expertise informs governance. Pakistan’s reformers appear to draw inspiration from this model, aiming to propel their civil service into a modern paradigm.
But it’s not all smooth sailing. For starters, this could leave a ton of CSS hopefuls high and dry, kids who’ve spent years prepping for the old exam, memorising essays and trivia. The test-prep academies that thrive on that system might go bust too.
Then there’s the practical side. The FPSC is already stretched thin. Can it really administer new exams efficiently given its shoddy track record of delaying the regular CSS exams? No one’s spelled out how they’ll sort the clusters or keep things even-handed, the details regarding the specifics still remain scant.
The most formidable barrier, however, may be political. A specialist-driven bureaucracy could upend the patronage networks that have long dictated civil service assignments. Pliable and mobile generalists have suited the interests of power brokers; technocrats, less so. Will Pakistan’s political and military elite countenance a system that limits their sway? Historical precedents, such as the aborted reforms of the 1970s under Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, suggest resistance could derail progress.
So, here’s where Pakistan’s at: can it ditch the colonial leftovers and build something new? If the CSS reforms of 2025 work, they could line up the government with what a connected, techy world needs. Pulling it off would prove that Pakistan can reinvent itself, which is not easy for a place that often feels stuck.
But if it flops from bad planning, pushback, or just giving up, it’ll only make people more jaded about the whole system. The pressure’s on. By mid-2025, when these new exams might start, we’ll see if the civil service can turn from a slog into something that actually moves the needle. Everyone’s watching Islamabad, waiting to see if this gutsy idea holds up.
Failure, however, remains a tangible risk. Should the reforms falter, due to flawed execution, entrenched opposition, or waning resolve, they could exacerbate disillusionment with governance itself. The timeline is tight: by mid-2025, the first cluster-based exams could launch, revealing whether the civil service can evolve from a symbol of stagnation into a catalyst for advancement. Attention is now fixed on Islamabad, where a daring vision teeters on the edge of realization.
If you want to submit your articles and/or research papers, please check the Submissions page.
The views and opinions expressed in this article/paper are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Paradigm Shift.
The author is studying Economics at the National University of Science and Technology (NUST) with a keen interest in financial affairs, international relations, and geo-politics.