countering islamophobia

Countering Islamophobia Through Dialogue To Combat Anti-Muslim Sentiments

In this article, Hania Sabeen underlines the pervasive issue of Islamophobia, highlighting instances of discrimination and violence against Muslims worldwide, particularly in Western countries. She emphasizes the need for constructive dialogue to combat anti-Muslim sentiments and counter the harmful narrative of Samuel P. Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations." She stresses that Pakistan, as a Muslim-majority nation, faces significant repercussions from rising Islamophobia and must engage in discussions that enhance global cooperation and combat stereotypes.

We live in a world brazenly mired in terror and misinterpretation; the phantom of Islamophobia haunts us more than ever before. Picture this: in France, the Quran is being burned, the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is being caricatured and mocked in public, and women’s abaya (modest clothing) is banned. In Sweden, a man called Salwan Momika, an Iraqi refugee is publicly incinerating copies of the Quran. In the West, Muslim women are shamed for wearing headscarves (hijab), and Muslims are discriminated against in the workplace. Shootings of mosques are all too common, such as the 2019 New Zealand Mosque massacre. According to the research conducted by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), there has been a prominent surge in online Islamophobic content. It does not exist only in the West; marginalized communities of Muslim minorities bear the brunt of anti-Muslim elements even in India. All of this illustrates a stark reality, Islamophobia is not imaginary, but a terror that threatens our common humanity. Countering Islamophobia is a need of the hour.

Now is the time for Pakistan to act because we are at the crossroads of civilization. There is a need to utilize the opportunity to fill in the gaps by utilizing constructive dialogue. How much longer will we be clinging to the bogus narrative that Samuel P. Huntington tried to carve into the world with Clash of Civilizations? The reductive perspective to treat the civilizations as completely homogeneous and hence to give partiality of one culture over the other should, by now, have been abandoned. The creation of an iron curtain between civilizations, and the inculcation of an “us vs them” demarcation is nothing but lunacy. Reflecting on these lines, we must surely agree that our survival as a truly globalized society depends on proper conversation through which we can build relationships and burn down the walls.

What Are The Stakes For Pakistan? 

The essence of Pakistan’s identity and its international reputation is at risk due to the upward wave of Islamophobia—the fear of Islam and Muslims in general. As a Muslim-majority nation, Pakistan is frequently depicted through the lens of extremism and bigotry. As Allama Iqbal noted: A thorn pricked in Kabul sends waves of agony across the entire region. Thus, the fate of Muslims all over the world affects Pakistan. The Christchurch Mosque shooting in New Zealand during Friday prayers sent shockwaves across the globe and hit Muslims hard. They mourned the victims but also faced the brutal truth that the world still sees them through the lens of fear. In 2020, in France, a school teacher, was murdered for showing caricatures of the Holy Prophet (PBUH), it further widened the gap between “us” (Muslims) and “them” (Non-Muslims). There were massive protests in Pakistan demanding a boycott of France. These events illustrate how escalating anti-Muslim rhetoric and hate speech can adversely affect not only the Muslim community in the West but also damage Pakistan’s international standing. Resultantly, allowing prejudice and discrimination to flourish, and leading to a surge in harassment and violence against Muslims.

The Clash of Civilizations: A Harmful Misconception 

Samuel P. Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations thesis suggests that cultural identities are the root cause of global conflict. But this is a simplistic view of civilizations and has dangerous consequences. According to Huntington, Pakistan is an antagonist in the global struggle between the East and the West. But this is too simplistic; Pakistan is a dynamic country with a rich history, diverse culture, and a vibrant society. The Clash of Civilizations doesn’t recognize the intricate interdependence of our global community through trade, migration, and cultural exchange. Edward Said calls this “ignorance” a threat to humanity, as it breeds fear and divides us. Said critiques the tendency to “other” populations, arguing that it ultimately cultivates animosity and paves the way for conflict. He believes Huntington’s thesis is rooted in misconceptions and illusions, which perpetuate stereotypes, particularly against Muslim societies in the West. One troubling consequence of this is the rise of Orientalism, anti-immigration sentiment, and gendered imperialism within Western societies. 

Dialogue: The Path to Understanding 

Antonio Guterres, UN Secretary-General, in his 2021 speech warned of the “virus of hate” spreading at an international level and impacting Muslims inexplicably; raising awareness for having dialogue to counter Islamophobia. Instead of adhering to the Clash of Civilizations, we should embrace and promote the idea of “Dialogue among Civilizations.” This approach encourages engagement through conversations that transcend boundaries. Dialogue genuinely fosters empathy, cooperation, and understanding. The “Dialogue among Civilizations” stands in contrast to the Clash of Civilizations. Key advocates of this idea include Muhammad Khatami, with Kofi Annan later supporting and promoting the same concept. This theoretical framework is deeply rooted in diplomacy, emphasizing the importance of cooperation and communication through mutual dialogue to foster understanding and respect among civilizations worldwide. Proponents of this dialogue believe it is the only viable solution to the complex issues our world faces, which stem from misrepresentations, misunderstandings, ignorance, and stereotypes.

The interfaith dialogue that took place after the tragic shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh serves as a powerful example of this utility. In this event, leaders from various faith communities came together to denounce violence and promote collaboration. This situation serves as a great example of how dialogue can mend wounds and create connections. Likewise, the “Muslims for Peace” initiative was born out of the rising anti-Muslim sentiment after 9/11. This grassroots movement aimed to portray a positive image of Muslims through community service, education, and outreach. Amid hate, they chose to build understanding and showed that empathy can overcome fear.

Pakistan’s Role in Facilitating Dialogue To Dismantle Islamophobia

Pakistan must recognize its potential as a strategic player and a key representative of the Muslim ummah. To counter the challenge of Islamophobia, Pakistan must adopt a noteworthy role in promoting dialogue. Factually, Pakistan has always been vocal about the rights of Muslims on various global platforms like the United Nations. Pakistan needs to now profess itself as an advocate of dialogue and cooperation. Earlier in 2019, Pakistan organized the International Conference on the Role of Youth in Peacebuilding to the cause of dialogue and reconciliation. Pakistan has been regularly highlighting Islamophobia at the United Nations General Assembly. The state has also rightly spearheaded the resolution to declare March 15 as the International Day to Counter Islamophobia, which is a crucial measure to signal to the international community that anti-Muslim discrimination is a global challenge that requires urgent action. 

The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) has been recording incidents of Islamophobia for years now and has released an annual report that proclaims the need for more tolerance and understanding. Pakistan is leading these agendas through OIC. Therefore, these events are important because they help dynamic leaders share ideas for the advancement of peace and place Pakistan in the international context as a facilitator of dialogue and cooperation.

Identifying Gaps in Current Dialogue Efforts

Regardless of such steps taken, there are noteworthy gaps in our approach to combat Islamophobia. The neglect of grassroots engagement, where stereotypes and misconceptions are most entrenched, is a common issue while addressing Islamophobia. For instance, the Western educational systems often fail to satisfactorily represent the rich diversity of Islamic culture, which breeds ignorance. According to the findings of the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding (ISPU) 2017 Report, nearly 60% of Americans had little to no knowledge about Islam. In Pakistan, the lack of dialogue with Western societies habitually results in unexploited opportunities that otherwise could ensure cultural exchange and understanding. In the longer run, this results in making it harder to challenge existing stereotypes. 

The Bridge Initiative: A Model for Meaningful Dialogue

Pakistan needs to adopt the Bridge Initiative Model to effectively address rampant Islamophobia. This approach would create more opportunities for engagement, aiming to clear the misconceptions obscuring the hearts and minds of many around the world. The major components of the Bridge Initiative could include academic exchange programs between universities in Western and Muslim countries for student exchanges. Such programs would help build rapport between the two cultures, thereby dispelling stereotypes. Media collaboration between Muslim and Western media could help showcase a positive image of Muslims, as seen in initiatives like “Muslim for Peace.” Community forums should be organized to host interfaith events; for instance, programs like U.S. Ramadan Iftars, where Muslims invite non-Muslims, promote unity, and break down stereotypes. An international monitoring body, possibly backed by the OIC, should be established to oversee Islamophobic incidents, advocate for tolerance, and hold countries accountable. Adopting such a model would position Pakistan as a leader in the global fight against Islamophobia.

Conclusion: A Call to Action For All Muslims

Pakistan must view the fight against Islamophobia as both a moral obligation and a strategic necessity. Choosing dialogue and understanding over division and fear is essential for reshaping the global narrative and fostering a more inclusive world community. In these critical times, we must prioritize unity over division. The wounds of ignorance inflicted today will continue to fester in the future, so these must be healed through empathy and understanding ensured by dialogue. Not only Pakistan but all humanity can be empowered by bridging the gaps between civilizations. The way forward is well-defined: Muslims must turn the tide against Islamophobia and celebrate the strength found in diversity through dialogue. They must advocate for understanding, establishing that in the face of hate, love, empathy, and dialogue will always triumph.


If you want to submit your articles and/or research papers, please check the Submissions page.

The views and opinions expressed in this article/paper are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Paradigm Shift.

About the Author(s)
Hania Sabeen

Hania Sabeen, a gold medalist in International Relations from Bahria University, is an MPhil candidate at Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad. Her research centres on international politics, geo-economics and diplomacy, with publications in the Middle East Journal of Islamic Studies and the Kuwait Scholars Journal.