Afghan Refugee management is no longer a humanitarian issue – it is a defining test for Pakistan’s policy oversight. The gradual influx of refugees has pushed Pakistan to the crossroads, where the question lies in balancing humanitarian responsibility with national concerns. Every repatriation is a reflection- not only about migration but about the nation’s institutional and regulatory measures.

Recent Developments in Repatriation Drive-July 2026
Pakistan commenced a new initiative on 10 July, aimed at identifying, detaining, and deporting Afghans lacking valid visas, as migrants in Islamabad observed a rise in police checkpoints and heightened scrutiny of documents. This enforcement initiative follows a directive from Pakistan’s Interior Ministry issued over a week ago to provincial governments, special administrative regions, and authorities in the Islamabad Capital Territory. The instruction urged local officials to expedite the identification, detention, and deportation of Afghans without appropriate visas.
The implementation of this measure has raised concerns among Afghans residing in Pakistan, including refugees and asylum seekers, who express fears of arrest and involuntary repatriation to Afghanistan. According to statistics mentioned by Pakistan’s Interior Ministry and the United Nations refugee agency, over 1.1 million Afghans have returned from Pakistan since the onset of 2025. United Nations figures also show that nearly 2.4 million Afghans returned from Pakistan between September 2023 and the end of May 2026.
Towards a Balanced Afghanistan Refugee Policy
As Pakistan is the host to one of the largest refugee populations, it is a need of the hour to consider actionable steps for sustainable and humane policies. The absence of any national refugee law, marked by a difficult asylum-seeking process, has no doubt exacerbated the refugee crisis. On the other hand, this influx has caused demographic, security, and economic dilemmas. The recommendations emphasize the need for better and strategic collaboration between Pakistan and other international organizations to ensure long-term solutions for Afghan refugees and the host country as well.
Introducing a National Legal Framework
Refugees in Pakistan are governed by two legal statutes, the Tripartite Agreement and the Foreigners Act 1946, which was amended in 2001. The Foreigners Act states that refugees are not entitled to Pakistan’s citizenship. No provision of law or agreements allows for legal citizenship status to refugees. Therefore, it can be said that Pakistan has allowed the entry of refugees not on legal grounds but based on humanitarian grounds. It is imperative to enact comprehensive national asylum legislation to deal with future scenarios.
The legislation should be based on the following features:
- Rights guaranteed to refugees: This framework should clearly highlight the rights given to refugees, including healthcare, education, employment, etc.
- Compatibility with International Law: Although Pakistan is not a signatory state to the 1951 Convention on Refugees and 1967 Protocol, legislation enacted should be based on international humanitarian standards.
- Clear asylum procedures: The law should state clear procedures followed by transparency, fairness, and accountability in granting asylum
Enacting a proper piece of legislation is crucial for establishing predictable frameworks for protecting the rights and clarifying the obligations for better refugee management in Pakistan.
Fostering Global Participation in Refugee Management
Of equal importance is International Responsibility sharing. The international community shall focus on burden sharing at the global level, particularly by wealthier nations. The Global Compact on Refugees calls for burden sharing. This Compact has a purpose to respond to the world’s large-scale displacement by considering the principle of international responsibility sharing and highlighting the protection, assistance, and pursuit of comprehensive solutions. This Compact has different dimensions, which include: easing pressure and burden on the host states, elements of self-reliance of refugees, access to safe solutions for the issues, support conditions, and mechanisms for safe return. Pakistan should actively engage in different forums for this cause to get the much-needed support.
Both states’ relevant institutions must agree and communicate long-term goals and solutions around migrant management and Afghan refugee policies. This could lead to the betterment of diverse frameworks and different implementation mechanisms for internationally recognized solutions to the refugee crisis. The U.S and other stable states should consider diversifying their humanitarian aid portfolio for Afghan refugees residing in Pakistan, along with the assistance of UNHCR and the government of Pakistan.
Revitalizing Solution Strategy for Afghan Refugees (SSAR)
A comprehensive conceptual and operational framework such as the Solution Strategy for Afghan Refugees (SSAR) is the need of the hour. Such new frameworks will help and assist in reconciling the concerns and needs of host countries such as Pakistan, including the convergence of interests of all stakeholders and bringing tangible and productive benefits for entire communities in refugee-majority areas. This can be achieved by strengthening social and physical health. infrastructure, offsetting the negative impacts of protracted refugee presence on the weak environment and local economies
Civil Society as a Partner in Refugee Management
Strong civil society engagement can also prove beneficial in this regard. This requires positive participation and productive engagement of a variety of civil society actors. National and international NGOs should be proactively involved in developing refugee-specific protection portfolios and play a role in their effective implementation. Furthermore, these active bodies can ensure that measures are undertaken to build the capacity of the vulnerable, as well as the delivery of services in remote areas or places inaccessible to other stakeholders. The engagement of civil society can prove beneficial, as evidenced by current approaches; for instance, in Iran, the International Consortium for Refugees and the Agency Coordinating Body for Afghan Relief seek to ensure effective coordination and joint advocacy. Pakistan should seek to adopt international administrative practices within a security-conscious and rights-based compliant structure.
Final Reflections
To meet the demands of both the host nation and the refugees, Pakistan’s recent repatriation policy for Afghan refugees needs to be revised strategically. It is a fact that Pakistan, one of the main destinations for Afghan migrants, has its own set of difficulties, such as civil unrest, security issues, and economic hardship. Afghan refugees continue to live in unstable circumstances with little access to opportunities, resources, or rights at the same time. A balanced repatriation policy is essential to properly handle these problems. Returnees would be guaranteed access to fundamental services like housing, healthcare, and education through a voluntary, gradual process that is coordinated with the Afghan government and foreign organizations like the UNHCR. Pakistan can meet its humanitarian commitments and solve its internal problems more effectively with an updated, comprehensive repatriation strategy.
It is an undeniable reality that compulsion and coercive means can never provide sustainable and long-lasting solutions to the crisis. Pakistan must focus on dialogue, legal safeguards, and cooperative strategies.
If you want to submit your articles and/or research papers, please visit the Submissions page.
To stay updated with the latest jobs, CSS news, internships, scholarships, and current affairs articles, join our Community Forum!
The views and opinions expressed in this article/paper are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Paradigm Shift.





