The Fluidity of Political Labels: No Permanent Friends or Foes

Introduction

Politics is, by definition, a field of uncertainty and contradictions. It is not uncommon for the sheer juxtaposition of how people perceive one another at the beginning of their political career and the later stages to unveil an extraordinary pliability regarding how morality and leadership are viewed. What is deemed abhorrent and reprehensible today can very easily be lauded tomorrow. This instability is not just bizarre but rather a recurring trend in international politics. This piece examines changes in people and groups in the political field and explores the plasticity of words and labels such as “terrorist” and “leader.”

The Dichotomy of Political Labels

Ahmed Al-Sharaa and the US

Ahmed al-Sharaa, president of the temporary Syrian government, is an ideal example of how political myths change throughout history. In the Syrian civil war, a former prominent leader of rebel groups, al-Sharaa, was affiliated with organizations listed as terrorist groups by the United States, the United Kingdom, and other international forces. His relationship with extremist groups, including al-Qaeda, made him a global security risk. However, al-Sharaa was distracted by the way he differed from militant politics and appeared as a figure who would go for reconciliation and a sensible approach.

In May 2025, Ahmed al-Sharaa held a meeting with US President Donald Trump, with a major change in international diplomacy. This collection, to achieve dialogue and stability in Syria, simulates complex dances of geopolitics and leaders about leadership. For most people, the meeting emphasized that global politics favors interests over loyalty. For the political figures created from the militant leader, the infection of divided actions has to show liquidity to political identity that transmits geopolitical interests.

From Freedom Fighter to Terrorist: The Osama bin Laden Paradigm

The transition of Osama bin Laden’s image from that of a “freedom fighter,” which was the case at the time of the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan, to that of an “international terrorist” post-September 11 is a reflection of the fluidity of political alliances. During the height of the Cold War, we saw Bin Laden and the Mujahideen on the good side of the US, which at the time was against the Soviets. But as the US and the Mujahideen’s goals didn’t align anymore, that changed. This is also a very clear example of the practical element of US foreign policy: that it may be quick to form friendships but also just as quick to break them in light of short-term strategic benefits, which may or may not include principle.

The US Role in Branding Leaders

The branding of individuals and groups as leaders or terrorists by the United States is an all-too-familiar theme in world politics. From the Taliban’s initial collaboration with the US to subsequent demonization, the trend is obvious. Equally, leaders such as Muammar Gaddafi fell from ally to outcast, indicating the fungibility of US alliances. Such selective political labels or branding awaken serious questions regarding the ethical legitimacy of a superpower’s role in creating global opinions.

Narendra Modi: From the “Butcher of Gujarat” to the Masses’ Leader

Narendra Modi is called the “Butcher of Gujarat” because people thought he was playing a role in becoming prime minister of India in the riots in 2002, and a good world leader shows how political stories can change. His climb to power demonstrates the strong effect voting has on reshaping narratives. His critics often bring up his Hindutva roots, but those who support him see him as a progressive leader who has improved India’s standing. This split view is typical of how people often judge political legitimacy based on their own opinions.

Imran Khan’s Fall from Grace

In Pakistan, the political journey of Imran Khan offers a modern-day example of how speedy fortunes can alternate in politics. Once celebrated as a charismatic leader who promised a “new Pakistan,” Khan now finds himself jailed under the banner of terrorism. His supporters view these charges as politically influenced, whilst his opponents view them as a vital measure to uphold the rule of law. This stark transformation underscores the precariousness of political careers and the blurred traces between leadership and vilification.

Lessons from Political Flexibility

A meeting between al-Sharaa and an American president and other such cases presents deep lessons. The most important lesson is that politics is a field where practicality trumps ideology. Friendship and rivalry are determined by changing the geopolitical form instead of the moralist bipolar. Therefore, politicians must go carefully, because today’s friends can become tomorrow’s enemies.

Another lesson is the power of history. The ability to shape assumptions is an important tool in politics. It is clear how Modi’s image was replaced through strategic communication, or how American freedom fighters were transformed into terrorists when their interests were no longer interconnected.

Politics is always adaptable since it is an image of how complicated human societies are. Sharp lines and strict definitions are not common since political survival relies heavily on adjustment and compromise. This can be seen in local as well as global politics. The US changing its allies, Modi becoming powerful, and Imran Khan losing power all show that politics is less about endurance and more about adjusting to change.

Conclusion

The trajectory from being a terrorist to a leader or vice versa is not exceptional but an indication of the nature of politics. It signifies the lack of moral absolutes in a field that is controlled by pragmatism and perception. Though this malleability can be disturbing, it also indicates the adaptive character of politics that is necessary to grapple with the perpetually changing issues of the world. With this understanding of these dynamics, leaders and citizens are better able to steer the political direction, knowing that in politics, nothing is concrete and absolute.

---

If you want to submit your articles and/or research papers, please visit the Submissions page.

To stay updated with the latest jobs, CSS news, internships, scholarships, and current affairs articles, join our Community Forum!

The views and opinions expressed in this article/paper are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Paradigm Shift.