Covering the domestic and regional dynamics, the author, James Shires carried a deeply analytical weave, of stirring the moral maneuvers of cyberspace in his book, “The Politics of Cybersecurity in the Middle East,” published in 2021 by C. Hurst and Co. Publishers in London. Being an academician of cyber statecraft, his other work “Countering cyber proliferation: Zeroing in on Access-as-a-Service” published by Oxford University Press, reflected the prolific proliferation of cyber offenses along with 6 other scholars of corresponding majors in cybersecurity dichotomies. Based on the cybersecurity dilemma, its challenges, and a historical in-depth view, the book confers technological 5th Generation tactics of cybercrime—warfare, or elements—covering the GCC states as well as the Middle East, a preview of globalization through internet protocols is deliberated.
Summary
The work is a groundbreaking analysis of Middle Eastern cybersecurity politics. James Shires demonstrates how the term “cybersecurity” is retooled by the various states throughout their contextualization of phenomena and terminologies, which perhaps as well can be comprehensibly slanted by the businesses, and other such institutions to incorporate a wide range of concepts, along with state discord, tailored spyware, national data control mechanisms, and foreign intrusion through spills and untruths, pulling on fresh discussions and iconic research work. Key technical systems in addition to the interpersonal relationships supporting digital progress are shaped by these evolving semantics. But regardless of the way the phrase is used, it is obvious that cybersecurity is a crucial component of the state’s modern affairs.
As per the author’s perspectives, the Middle East’s cybersecurity politics differs in a novel way, with routine politics or evolutionary politics. Though the digital insecurities figurate modern-day authoritarianism, it, in its politically emblematical reach-out, possesses top-up agendas for the national affairs in any state. Per se, the concept of cybersecurity ought to be attached within the strategic lens rather than being interpreted in the diverse “filling” terminologies. That is indeed, tending to insert the capitalistic goals and financial and political rewards, thus the euphemistic term, strategic is used. It also branches out thoughtfully, a blend in the three main arenas of science, politics, and traditions related to cyber protocols.
Focusing on the cybersecurity complex in the Middle East; Egypt, and Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states, mainly Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, Saudi Arabia, and UAE, the text strikes first, the recognition of “cyber form” to either create peril or a weapon possessing enormous power. Tracing, especially Iran and Israel over their normative change through the cyber course, where an argument is devised on whether the actions of hacking are simply moralistic or connected to the strategic calculations of the transaction cost.
Analysis
Analytically, as we lean more towards the pros and cons when studying a subject, therefore, describing and differentiating between terms such as malware, bad ad malicious and etcetera was of fundamental concern, enhancing the book’s readability score.
Evaluation
As its title indicates, this publication promises a groundbreaking analysis of the Middle Eastern politics of cyber security. It specializes in Egypt and the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) nations, namely Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). I demonstrate how, in such countries, the term “cybersecurity” is repurposed by states, businesses, and different institutions to embody a plethora of problems, along with state discord, residential data safeguards, and international intrusions. This is done using novel press conferences and existing surveys. Key technical platforms as well as the societal relationships supporting virtual progress are shaped by these evolving semantics. But regardless of how the phrase is used, it is certain that cybersecurity is a crucial component of the state’s modern governance.
Critique
Moving into the thesis, the reasoning argues that cybersecurity and ambiguity are more closely related than would initially appear. Cybersecurity focuses on a variety of strategies and devices that strive to precisely quantify technical and socio-technological hazards, evaluating them versus other societal and fiscal concerns and thereby seeking to reduce their potential and/or manage them effectively. As a result, cybersecurity works to lessen or control uncertainty.
The analysis of volatility in the book, nevertheless, demonstrates that cybersecurity can also be utilized specifically to manipulate unpredictability for particular groups in divisive politics, dependent on confidentially, repression, and nuance to boost and leverage volatility instead of minimizing and encapsulating it.
Ambiguity about events is a useful aspect of a thriving republic. However, some sorts of uncertainty are essential for basic liberties and egalitarian democratic institutions. As a result, we must be aware of how governmental actors use cybersecurity to manage uncertainty while simultaneously making sure that cybersecurity ideas retain and safeguard the types of unpredictability that we treasure.
Subsequent analysis dissecting the concept of dissident activists utilized in this work from the standpoint of domestic politics hinted at in the factual parts. A variety of intricate links between “centrists” and more conservative “backliners” have been found by research on political dissent and populist activities and such ties are expected to surface in disagreements over the best cybersecurity tactics. By examining other pertinent comparative instances and transatlantic linkages at both the official and oppositional levels, it made up for the shortcomings of an isolated-scenario study method, echoing research patterns in controversial dynamics more generally.
In global affairs, cybersecurity is a tricky and contentious topic. Publications on the topic frequently fall short of capturing the unique realities of cybersecurity in the Middle East, especially in Egypt and the GCC nations, by concentrating on the “big powers”—the US, the EU, Russia, and China.
Comparison
As compared to the others, the publication incites the respective nations’ cybersecurity tactics and strategies are intertwined with activities of their traditional friends in the US and Europe and is based on the exchange of information, money, innovation, and experience. These regimes also have autocratic political frameworks that are more akin to those of China or Russia, as well as digital technology policies that place a strong emphasis on espionage and security. The book’s objective is to expand cybersecurity research outside the “big powers” and demonstrate how contemporary politics and economics frequently dictate the extent and character of cybersecurity in the same way that the fundamentals of engineering do.
Author’s Presuppositions in The Politics of Cybersecurity in the Middle East
The readers may learn how to go behind the sensationalism of the most recent adware disclosures, pirated papers, or reports of information warfare to discover how certain incidents are detected, evaluated, and conveyed,” according to the Security website. This enlightens others not just concerning the Middle Eastern politics surrounding cybersecurity, but also about the growing significance of cybersecurity predicaments in the daily lives of people, businesses, and governments all over the modern age.
Conclusion
The politics of the Middle East in cyber information have played a manipulated notion by digital technology since the 19th and 20th centuries, now zooming in on the discourse of “cybersecurity” in the publication of Shires. It debates over cybersecurity being the foundation for modern-day order that expands to the paradigm of neo-liberalism, mobilized by targeted surveillance.
As a compliment to digital authoritarianism, commencing from the Arab Spring, international relations focus on Middle Eastern politics of influence and power of various strata in Gulf monarchies. The attacks by, the UAE, Saudi Arabia’s Revolution, Egypt, Iraq, and Syria illustrate that “Islamic cyber resistance” has insight into confidential documents on the accounts of Israeli commands. It thus entails a rhythmic venture on cybersecurity fundamentals residing in the Middle East.
Moreover, the notion of “ethical maneuvers” serves as the author’s main idea. An ethical maneuver is the modification of technology and merit assumptions inside a specialist field—in this scenario, cybersecurity—for tactical advantage. Moral maneuvers are more likely to be tried in fields with elevated amounts of “symbolic capital,” which means that grasping it involves a lot of skill and expenditure. Next, the subject or area must be cryptic, suggesting that comprehending it requires a lot of experience and equity. Both of these characteristics are abundant in cybersecurity.
In a nutshell, in “The Politics of Cybersecurity in the Middle East,” Shires presents a profound and penetrating analysis, revealing the extent to which moral frameworks influence and define cybersecurity practices across the region. His work repositions cybersecurity, not as a static concept, but, as one that adapts fluidly to the priorities of varied stakeholders, reinterpreting whom it serves and what it seeks to protect. Through a masterful blend of political insight, technological understanding, and regional expertise, Shires captures the nuanced, complex landscape of cybersecurity shaped by both state and non-state imperatives.
If you want to submit your articles and/or research papers, please check the Submissions page.
The views and opinions expressed in this article/paper are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Paradigm Shift.
She is currently working as a Research Officer at the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) and pursuing her MPhil in Strategic Studies from National Defence University.